Christian Sigsgaard vs Nino Serdarusic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Sigsgaard vs N. Serdarusic

Christian Sigsgaard
DEN
l
l
l
l
w
w
w
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
28
Age
28
-
Height
6'3" (191 cm)
633
C. Rank
836
501
Best Rank
167
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$79.7K
-
Plays
Right-Handed

Nino Serdarusic
CRO
w
l
w
w
l
w
l
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
28
Age
28
-
Height
6'3" (191 cm)
633
C. Rank
836
501
Best Rank
167
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$79.7K
-
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Sigsgaard 1 - 0 Serdarusic
They have played 2 sets in total, with Christian Sigsgaard winning 2 and Nino Serdarusic winning 0. The last match between Christian Sigsgaard and Nino Serdarusic was at the M25 Trento, 18-02-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Christian Sigsgaard getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sigsgaard | 1 |
| Serdarusic | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Trento(02-18-25)
Christian Sigsgaard
7
6
Nino Serdarusic
6
2
C. Sigsgaard vs N. Serdarusic H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $79,735 |
| 63.45% (125-72) | Career Total W/L | 53.44% (365-318) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 2 | Titles | 8 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Sigsgaard vs N. Serdarusic Match Preview:
- Notable second serve performance: In the past six months, Sigsgaard has displayed a commendable record on their second serve, winning 51.89% of points, while Serdarusic has achieved a success rate of 49.17%. This particular statistic, which showcases their prowess in this area, holds significant importance when it comes to predicting match outcomes.
- Return game statistics: Examining the return statistics of Sigsgaard reveals that, in recent form, they have triumphed in 56.15% of points on their opponent's second serve. Conversely, Serdarusic has secured a success rate of 40.17% in this aspect. As for the first serve returns, Sigsgaard boasts a 35.63% success rate, while Serdarusic has recorded 30.43%. These statistics prove to be influential factors in determining the favored player in their head-to-head matchup.
- Performance under pressure: When facing pivotal moments, Sigsgaard has impressively saved 67.44% of breakpoints in recent form. On the other hand, Serdarusic has demonstrated a slightly lower efficiency by saving 57.58%. This statistic holds considerable value for those engaging in in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the course of the past year, Sigsgaard has emerged victorious in 66.67% of their matches (16 wins / 8 losses). Meanwhile, Serdarusic has achieved a success rate of 47.62% (20 wins / 22 losses). These figures provide a comprehensive overview of their head-to-head record.
- Surface strengths and weaknesses: Sigsgaard has showcased their utmost proficiency on clay courts, where they have achieved a remarkable 64% success rate (27 wins / 15 losses). Conversely, their performance on grass courts has been less impressive, with a 0% success rate (0 wins / 1 loss). Serdarusic, similarly, excels on clay courts, boasting a 58% success rate (304 wins / 223 losses), while their performance on grass courts remains subpar, with a 0% success rate (0 wins / 2 losses).
- Player level: In the previous year, Sigsgaard has predominantly competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with $10K prize pools, winning 66.67% of their matches (16 wins / 8 losses). Conversely, Serdarusic has primarily participated in Challengers/ITF tournaments with prize pools exceeding $10K, achieving a 44% success rate (11 wins / 14 losses). When assessing players' statistics to determine the favored candidate, it is essential to consider the level of the events in which they have been competing.
- Opponent quality statistics: Over the past twelve months, Sigsgaard has faced opponents with an average ranking of 459.67, while Serdarusic has encountered players with an average ranking of 411.38.
- Deciding set performance: For those intrigued by live predictions and betting opportunities, analyzing players' performance in deciding sets becomes crucial. In the last twelve months, Sigsgaard has emerged triumphant in 60% of deciding sets played, while Serdarusic has achieved a success rate of 44% in all matches on the tour.
- Current event head-to-head statistics: The significance of historical player performance in predicting tennis matches cannot be undermined. However, once a particular event is underway, it is imperative to consider the current event statistics as well, as they provide insights into a player's current form. For this purpose, please refer to the section below (eventStats) if the players have participated in matches during the ongoing event. Additionally, certain players often exhibit enhanced performances in specific events, and this aspect should be considered when determining the eventual outcome.
- Break point conversion: Analyzing recent form, Sigsgaard has successfully converted 40.48% of their breakpoints, while Serdarusic has capitalized on 32.73% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. This crucial statistic provides valuable tips for live in-game betting when either player finds themselves with a breakpoint opportunity.
- Should you be interested in models that accurately predict tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point. (Warning: Only suitable for avid statistics enthusiasts)
Christian Sigsgaard vs Nino Serdarusic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Sigsgaard vs N. Serdarusic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 10 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:13:35 | Average Match Time | 1:13:35 |
| 62% (36/58) | 1st Serve % | 68% (50/74) |
| 89% (32/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (35/50) |
| 55% (12/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (9/24) |
| 60% (3/5) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (1/1) |
| 41% (30/74) | Return Points Win % | 24% (14/58) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Sigsgaard 54%, Serdarusic 46%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Sigsgaard 51%, Serdarusic 54%.
Break Points Saved %: Sigsgaard 61%, Serdarusic 57%.
C. Sigsgaard Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
F | L | 7-6(3) 6-0 | ||
SF | W | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | ||
QF | W | 6-4 7-6(2) | ||
R2 | W | 6-2 6-4 | ||
N. Serdarusic Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 7-5 6-4 | ||
Q3 | W | 7-5 6-0 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 6-3 | ||
R2 | L | 6-4 ret. | ||
R1 | W | 7-5 6-4 | ||

C. Sigsgaard vs N. Serdarusic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.45% (125/72) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.44% (365/318) |
| 62.70% (279/166) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.20% (823/724) |
| 55.23% (2309/1872) | Games Win/Loss | 52.17% (7562/6934) |
| 63.53% (54/31) | Hard Win/Loss | 34.62% (18/34) |
| 62.30% (38/23) | Clay Win/Loss | 57.62% (310/228) |
| 66.00% (33/17) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40.66% (37/54) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.37 |
| 443 | Aces Total | 2592 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 313 | Total Double Faults | 1490 |
| 1:15:30 | Average Match Time | 1:27:56 |
| 442.68 | Average Opponent Rank | 538.08 |
| 66% (6621/10033) | 1st Serve % | 61% (24623/40578) |
| 67% (4450/6621) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (17438/24623) |
| 53% (1806/3412) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (7897/15955) |
| 48% (503/1049) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1698/3987) |
| 42% (4319/10263) | Return Points Win % | 39% (15817/40131) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 30.77% (4/9) |
| 28.57% (2/5) | Cups W/L | 100.00% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 26.92% (7/19) |
| 37.50% (3/5) | Challenger W/L | 44.73% (140/173) |
| 65.93% (120/62) | Futures W/L | 64.55% (213/117) |
| 63% (120/190) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (359/672) |
| 75% (3/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 56% (29/52) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (92/185) |
| 40% (19/48) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (90/186) |
| 86% (130/112) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (375/320) |
| 14% (130/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (375/55) |
| 19% (67/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (308/45) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
05:30 AM 18/11/25
Prediction04:03 AM 18/11/25
Prediction03:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction03:50 AM 18/11/25
Prediction04:05 AM 18/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
05:00
H2H 0-0
05:00
H2H 0-0
05:45
H2H 0-0
06:30
H2H 0-0
07:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal