Christian Sigsgaard vs Nino Serdarusic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Sigsgaard vs N. Serdarusic

Christian Sigsgaard

DEN

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

6'3" (191 cm)

626

C. Rank

836

501

Best Rank

167

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

$79.7K

Plays

Right-Handed

Nino Serdarusic

CRO

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

6'3" (191 cm)

626

C. Rank

836

501

Best Rank

167

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

$79.7K

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Sigsgaard 1 - 0 Serdarusic

They have played 2 sets in total, with Christian Sigsgaard winning 2 and Nino Serdarusic winning 0. The last match between Christian Sigsgaard and Nino Serdarusic was at the M25 Trento, 18-02-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Christian Sigsgaard getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Sigsgaard	1
Serdarusic	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) M25 Trento(02-18-25)

Stats

Christian Sigsgaard

Nino Serdarusic

C. Sigsgaard vs N. Serdarusic H2H Profile

C. Sigsgaard	Stats	N. Serdarusic
$0	Career Prize Money	$79,735
63.68% (128-73)	Career Total W/L	53.44% (365-318)
1	Indoor	0
2	Titles	8
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

C. Sigsgaard vs N. Serdarusic Match Preview:

Notable second serve performance: In the past six months, Sigsgaard has displayed a commendable record on their second serve, winning 51.89% of points, while Serdarusic has achieved a success rate of 49.17%. This particular statistic, which showcases their prowess in this area, holds significant importance when it comes to predicting match outcomes.
Return game statistics: Examining the return statistics of Sigsgaard reveals that, in recent form, they have triumphed in 56.15% of points on their opponent's second serve. Conversely, Serdarusic has secured a success rate of 40.17% in this aspect. As for the first serve returns, Sigsgaard boasts a 35.63% success rate, while Serdarusic has recorded 30.43%. These statistics prove to be influential factors in determining the favored player in their head-to-head matchup.
Performance under pressure: When facing pivotal moments, Sigsgaard has impressively saved 67.44% of breakpoints in recent form. On the other hand, Serdarusic has demonstrated a slightly lower efficiency by saving 57.58%. This statistic holds considerable value for those engaging in in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the course of the past year, Sigsgaard has emerged victorious in 66.67% of their matches (16 wins / 8 losses). Meanwhile, Serdarusic has achieved a success rate of 47.62% (20 wins / 22 losses). These figures provide a comprehensive overview of their head-to-head record.
Surface strengths and weaknesses: Sigsgaard has showcased their utmost proficiency on clay courts, where they have achieved a remarkable 64% success rate (27 wins / 15 losses). Conversely, their performance on grass courts has been less impressive, with a 0% success rate (0 wins / 1 loss). Serdarusic, similarly, excels on clay courts, boasting a 58% success rate (304 wins / 223 losses), while their performance on grass courts remains subpar, with a 0% success rate (0 wins / 2 losses).
Player level: In the previous year, Sigsgaard has predominantly competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with $10K prize pools, winning 66.67% of their matches (16 wins / 8 losses). Conversely, Serdarusic has primarily participated in Challengers/ITF tournaments with prize pools exceeding $10K, achieving a 44% success rate (11 wins / 14 losses). When assessing players' statistics to determine the favored candidate, it is essential to consider the level of the events in which they have been competing.
Opponent quality statistics: Over the past twelve months, Sigsgaard has faced opponents with an average ranking of 459.67, while Serdarusic has encountered players with an average ranking of 411.38.
Deciding set performance: For those intrigued by live predictions and betting opportunities, analyzing players' performance in deciding sets becomes crucial. In the last twelve months, Sigsgaard has emerged triumphant in 60% of deciding sets played, while Serdarusic has achieved a success rate of 44% in all matches on the tour.
Current event head-to-head statistics: The significance of historical player performance in predicting tennis matches cannot be undermined. However, once a particular event is underway, it is imperative to consider the current event statistics as well, as they provide insights into a player's current form. For this purpose, please refer to the section below (eventStats) if the players have participated in matches during the ongoing event. Additionally, certain players often exhibit enhanced performances in specific events, and this aspect should be considered when determining the eventual outcome.
Break point conversion: Analyzing recent form, Sigsgaard has successfully converted 40.48% of their breakpoints, while Serdarusic has capitalized on 32.73% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. This crucial statistic provides valuable tips for live in-game betting when either player finds themselves with a breakpoint opportunity.
Should you be interested in models that accurately predict tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point. (Warning: Only suitable for avid statistics enthusiasts)

Christian Sigsgaard vs Nino Serdarusic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. Sigsgaard vs N. Serdarusic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. Sigsgaard	Stats	N. Serdarusic
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
13	Games Won	8
9	Aces (Total)	10
3	Total Double Faults	1
1:13:35	Average Match Time	1:13:35
62% (36/58)	1st Serve %	68% (50/74)
89% (32/36)	1st Serve Win %	70% (35/50)
55% (12/22)	2nd Serve Win %	38% (9/24)
60% (3/5)	Break Pts Won %	100% (1/1)
41% (30/74)	Return Points Win %	24% (14/58)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

C. Sigsgaard Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
M15 Madrid - 24-11-2025
SF Izan Almazan ValienteI. Almazan	L	3-6 6-3 6-4	Stats
QF Pierre Yves BaillyP. Yves	W	1-6 6-4 7-5	Stats
R2 Anas MazdrashkiA. Mazdrashki	W	7-5 6-1	Stats
R1 Luka Talan LopaticL. Talan	W	6-4 6-2	Stats
Hamburg Challenger - 20-10-2025
Q1 Milos KarolM. Karol	L	6-3 6-4	Stats

View All

N. Serdarusic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Sofia 2 Challenger - 18-08-2025
R1 Andrej NedicA. Nedic	L	7-5 6-4	Stats
Q3 Sergey FominS. Fomin	W	7-5 6-0	Stats
Q1 Stefan LatinovicS. Latinovic	W	6-3 6-3	Stats
M25 Bol - 26-05-2025
R2 Matej DodigM. Dodig	L	6-4 ret.	Stats
R1 Kirill KivattsevK. Kivattsev	W	7-5 6-4	Stats

View All

C. Sigsgaard vs N. Serdarusic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. Sigsgaard	Stats	N. Serdarusic
63.68% (128/73)	YTD Win/Loss	53.44% (365/318)
62.86% (286/169)	Sets Win/Loss	53.20% (823/724)
55.23% (2361/1914)	Games Win/Loss	52.17% (7562/6934)
64.04% (57/32)	Hard Win/Loss	34.62% (18/34)
62.30% (38/23)	Clay Win/Loss	57.62% (310/228)
66.00% (33/17)	Indoor Hard W/L	40.66% (37/54)
0.00% (0/1)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/2)
0.22	Aces Per Game	0.37
460	Aces Total	2592
0.15	Double Faults Per Game	0.21
318	Total Double Faults	1490
1st Match	Average Match Time	1:27:56
444.53	Average Opponent Rank	538.29
66% (6804/10312)	1st Serve %	61% (24623/40578)
67% (4578/6804)	1st Serve Win %	71% (17438/24623)
53% (1862/3508)	2nd Serve Win %	49% (7897/15955)
48% (516/1082)	Break Points Won % (Total)	43% (1698/3987)
42% (4434/10550)	Return Points Win %	39% (15817/40131)
0% (0/0)	Slam W/L	30.77% (4/9)
28.57% (2/5)	Cups W/L	100.00% (1/0)
0% (0/0)	Main Tour W/L	26.92% (7/19)
37.50% (3/5)	Challenger W/L	44.73% (140/173)
66.13% (123/63)	Futures W/L	64.55% (213/117)
63% (123/194)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	53% (359/672)
75% (3/4)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	67% (2/3)
56% (29/52)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	50% (92/185)
40% (20/50)	Deciding Set Win %	48% (90/186)
86% (133/114)	1st Set Won, Won Match	85% (375/320)
14% (133/19)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	15% (375/55)
21% (68/14)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	15% (308/45)